Overlay
Sustainability

State of play of key sustainable finance legislation in the US after the US election

In our regular Sustainable Finance Policy and Regulation round-up we explore the latest developments shaping the market.

Table of Contents

State of play of key sustainable finance legislation in the US after the US elections

  • Key considerations for sustainable finance market participants

Other announcements and publications

EU

  • European Supervisory Authorities published their 2025 work programmes.
  • EU Deforestation rule delayed by one year, until 30 December 2025.
  • European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) set application deadlines for its guidelines on ESG Fund Names.
  • ESMA published consultation paper on Prospectus Regulation, including ESG and Green Bond Standard considerations.
  • European Supervisory Authorities’ (ESAs) finalised rules to facilitate access to financial and sustainability information on the European Single Access Point (ESAP).

 

UK

  • UK Transition Finance Market Review (TFMR) released its recommendations on scaling the transition finance market.
  • The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) provided temporary flexibility on Sustainability Disclosure Requirements (SDR) compliance.
  • A new solar taskforce was established to accelerate the rollout of solar energy in the UK.
  • The UK government has launched a new investment support scheme aimed at boosting funding for long-duration energy storage (LDES) projects.
  • The UK government has announced an initiative to improve energy efficiency standards for rented homes.
  • UK Climate Risk Forum published guides on 3 key areas of climate risk.

 

US

  • The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) dissolved its Climate and ESG Task Force.
  • Lawsuit filed against Texas saying the anti-ESG law violates the Constitution.

Recent policy developments and financial market implications

State of play of key sustainable finance legislation in the US after the US elections

In this edition we provide a recap of key climate and sustainability related legislation in the US right after the US elections.

 

Disclosure-focused

SEC climate related disclosure rules

In 2022, SEC proposed climate related disclosures that would require a domestic or foreign registrant to include certain climate-related information in its registration statements and periodic reports, such as on Form 10-K – largely in line with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).

The finalisation of the legislation has been delayed several times and it may be shelved completely under the Donald Trump administration.

 

SEC rules for investor disclosures about ESG investment practices

In 2022, SEC proposed legislation on “enhanced disclosures by certain investment advisers and investment companies about environmental, social, and governance investment practices” to improve information for investors concerning funds and advisers’ incorporation of ESG factors into their investment strategies. The draft introduced the concept of fund classification and proposed three categories with distinct disclosure requirements (ESG-integrated funds, ESG-focused funds, and Impact-focused funds). The finalisation of the rule has also been postponed several times and the likelihood of its finalisation and implementation under the Donald Trump administration is low.

 

California Bills SB 253 and SB 261

Two legislative pieces initially adopted in 2023:

  • SB 253 mandates that companies with more than USD 1bn in global revenue would be required to report scope 1, 2, and 3 emissions if they do any business in California. This is starting from 2026 for scope 1-2 emissions, and 2027 for scope 3 emissions.
  • SB 261 requires companies to disclose their climate-related risks and how these risks are managed. It covers public and private companies that do business in California, with annual global revenue of at least USD 500m. The first report would be required to be prepared by 1 January 2026, and then refreshed biennially. The bills were signed into law in September 2024 as SB 219. The bills projected to shape the ESG reporting landscape in the US as they come before the SEC rules, have wide-reaching scope including private companies.

 

Fund naming

Rules to prevent misleading or deceptive investment fund names

In Sep 2023 the SEC adopted amendments to the Investment Company Act “Names Rule” which regulates the names of registered investment funds. The amendments expand the scope of terms considered misleading if a fund does not invest at least 80% of its assets in accordance with its name. This includes terms suggesting an ESG focus, such as "sustainable”, "green", “social” etc. Funds with net assets exceeding USD 1bn will have to comply by Dec 2025; funds with net assets of less USD 1bn will have until June 2026.

 

Fiscal support programmes

Inflation Reduction Act

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), enacted in August 2022, represents a landmark piece of legislation in the United States, offering funding, programmes, and incentives to accelerate the transition to a clean energy economy in the amount of USD 369bn over the next ten years. Studies show that the impact of the legislation in terms of scaling investment has been profound. From the second half of 2022 through the first half of 2024 year, actual business and consumer investment totalled USD 493bn, a 71% increase from the two-year period preceding the legislation [1].

 

Investment strategies

Over 2021-2024 a number of states introduced [2] legislation to restrict consideration of ESG factors in the investment strategies and financing decisions of asset managers and other financial institutions. So far, states have enacted 42 laws in 19 states with the number slowing down in 2024, allegedly due to it being the elections year.

 

Key considerations for sustainable finance market participants

Issuers / borrowers

The impact of the US elections on key ESG and sustainability disclosure and finance regulations, while mostly to be felt in the US, may also have reverberations in other jurisdictions.

However, issuers and borrowers should not expect any immediate shifts in their ESG-related reporting or disclosure requirements and will have to continue to navigate the diverging frameworks. It’s likely that the market of green, social, sustainability / sustainability-linked instruments in USD will remain subdued. In Europe, issuers and borrowers should expect sustainability to remain in focus and while there are discussions on the rules and frameworks, it’s unlikely that the trajectory will be adjusted in the short-term regardless of the outcome in the US.

International issuers and borrowers that were hoping for continued synergy in terms of reporting and rules may not see that come to fruition, but as ESG remains important to banks, investors and stakeholders, across markets regardless of the specific rules, using Europe or UK rules as the foundations for reporting and disclosures will be useful.

 

Investors / lenders

Investors are likely set to continue to navigate the uncertainty associated with the state of adoption and implementation of the sustainability-related legislation in the US, as well as the challenging political environment – regardless of the election outcomes. This is likely to have an impact on the number of new ESG funds, as well as funds’ ability to maintain ESG-related terms in the fund names in trying to avoid scrutiny.

However, while the US may not be in the driving seat to implement climate and environmentally-related reporting rules at the federal level, more companies are expected to report voluntarily adopting the ISSB IFRS standards on climate and sustainability, as well as responding to the legislation in the State of California.  The EU CSRD has imposed extraterritorial requirements for multinational companies with significant presence in the EU which would also capture US companies. All of this will help improve the availability of sustainability-related information to investors.

With the IRA projected to remain in place, due to the impact it has already created, investors should be able to continue to capitalise on investment opportunities into technologies necessary for the climate and environmental transition.

Other announcements and publications

EU

European Supervisory Authorities published their 2025 work programmes

ESMA: In 2025, ESMA will continue progressing towards its strategic priorities and thematic drivers in line with its 2023-2028 strategy [3]:

Particular areas of focus include:

  • enhanced supervisory expectations and tools to combat greenwashing
  • improved ESG disclosures
  • The provision of targeted training

ESMA will also coordinate a range of activities with EU bodies including the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) on topics such as:

  • stress testing
  • Financial Markets Infrastructure (FMI)
  • cross-border crisis management
  • ESG and climate risk

They will also continue carrying out work with the National Competent Authorities on ESG disclosures.

 

EBA: The European Banking Authority (EBA) has also set up its work priorities for next year. Among EBA’s key deliverables will be its continued work on prudential treatment of exposures in relation to ESG [4].

Additionally, the EBA plans to:

  • Finalise its guidelines on ESG risks management (Q1)
  • Incorporate ESG and greenwashing considerations into existing EBA legal instruments on retail conduct and consumer protection, such as the EBA guidelines on Product Oversight and Governance (Q3)
  • Review guidelines on internal governance and guidelines on sound remuneration policies – to include ESG risks (Q3)
  • Continue building its ESG risk assessment tools to enable efficient monitoring of ESG risks in the banking sector and development of the green financial market, with a primary focus on environmental risks
  • Publish the second batch of ESG risk assessment and monitoring tools, as well as a report on effective riskiness, additional modifications to the framework and effects on financial stability and banking in (Q4)

Finally, the EBA will continue to work on ESG disclosures in the context of the Pillar 3 technical standards and coordinate the work on non-financial reporting at the EU level under the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD).

 

EIOPA: For the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority (EIOPA), sustainable finance remains one of its priorities [5]. EIOPA’s 2025 sustainable finance priorities focus on:

  • embedding ESG into the prudential and conduct frameworks
  • enhancing sustainability reporting
  • supporting supervisory authorities in managing climate-related risks

Key actions include implementing Solvency II Directive and working towards improved ESG data and catastrophe modelling to strengthen ESG risk management. EIOPA will advance rules on sustainability disclosures, greenwashing, and corporate reporting. It also plans to update its natural catastrophe insurance protection gap dashboard, prioritise addressing protection gaps, and address demand-side challenges to promote risk awareness and inclusion.

Globally, EIOPA will engage with international organisations (e.g., The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS), and United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP)), broadening its scope to include nature-related and social risks in its supervisory dialogues.

 

EU deforestation rule delayed by one year, until 30 December 2025

The European Commission proposed a one-year delay (as a phasing-in period) to the European Deforestation Regulation (EUDR). If approved by the European Parliament and the Council, it would make the law applicable on 30 December 2025 for large companies, and 30 June 2026 for micro- and small enterprises.

The Commission also published additional guidance documents [6] and a stronger international cooperation framework [7] to support global stakeholders, member states and third countries in their preparations for the implementation.

 

ESMA set application deadlines for its guidelines on ESG Fund Names

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) set compliance deadlines [8 ] for its guidelines on fund names using ESG or sustainability-related terms. New funds must comply by 21 November 2024, whereas the transitional period for funds existing before the application date will be 21 May 2025.

 

ESMA published consultation paper on prospectus regulation, including ESG and green bond standard considerations

On 28 October 2024, ESMA published a Consultation Paper (CP) [9] on draft technical advice under the prospectus regulation and a Call for Evidence (CfE) on prospectus liability – open for feedback by 31 December 2024. Among other topics, the CP puts forward proposals for non-equity securities that are advertised with ESG features.

ESMA uses its public statement on sustainability disclosure in prospectuses as the foundation for its recommendations, introducing a new Annex 21 as a supplemental building block for non-equity securities, particularly sustainability-linked and “use of proceeds” bonds (e.g., green, and social bonds, including bonds issued under the EU Green Bond Standard). ESMA proposes a reclassification of EU Green Bond factsheet disclosures to so called “Category C” information, allowing their incorporation by reference in final terms post-approval of the base prospectus. This aims to streamline the process for issuers.

While facilitating some flexibility, ESMA emphasises that most disclosures under the new Annex 21 will have to be made at the base prospectus level to meet the Prospectus Regulation’s "necessary information" test.

 

ESAs finalised rules to facilitate access to financial and sustainability information on the ESAP

The three European Supervisory Authorities (EBA, EIOPA and ESMA – the ESAs) published the final report [10] on the draft implementing technical standards (ITS) regarding certain tasks of the collection bodies and functionalities of the European Single Access Point (ESAP).

The requirements are designed to enable future users to be able to access and use financial and sustainability information effectively and effortlessly in a centralised ESAP platform.

The ESAP will facilitate access to publicly available information relevant to financial services, capital markets and sustainability.

The ESAP is expected to start collecting information in July 2026, while the publication of the information will start no later than July 2027.

 

UK

TFMR released its recommendations on scaling the transition finance market

On 17 October 2024, the UK Transition Finance Market Review (TFMR) published a report [11] with its recommendations on scaling an effective and credible transition finance market. TFMR is an independent market-led review commissioned by the UK Treasury and the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero and hosted by the City of London Corporation. James Close, Head of Climate Change at NatWest Group, was a member of the Transition Finance Market Review’s Expert Group.

The TFMR puts forward a series of recommendations on how to unlock the required levels of finance by creating the right policies, pathways, and signals for investment, including the following:

  • Transition Finance Classification System: establishing a classification system to ensure credibility and integrity in transition finance products.
  • Guidelines for Credible Transition Finance: proposing principles-based guidelines that allow flexibility while maintaining core standards across various markets, including those in emerging economies.
  • Transition Finance Council: forming a council to oversee the implementation of these recommendations, focusing on capacity building, and fostering collaboration among stakeholders.
  • Public-Private Collaboration: the review underscores the importance of collaboration between public and private sectors to unlock necessary financing and drive the transition effectively.

The review marks an important development which clearly demonstrates the UK’s focus on taking a leading role in transition finance. While the findings will now have to be analysed by the government prior to any further policy action taking place, the report provides valuable guidance that can be considered by the market– especially given the fact that financial institutions are already working to set up transition finance frameworks.

 

FCA provided temporary flexibility on SDR compliance

FCA announced temporary measures [12] allowing firms until 2 April 2025, to comply with the naming and marketing rules under the UK Sustainability Disclosure Requirements (SDR). The extension is aimed at helping firms prepare necessary disclosures while addressing concerns about greenwashing and pertains to firms that:

  • have submitted a completed application for approval of amended disclosures by 1 October 2024; and
  • are currently using one or more of the terms ‘sustainable’, ‘sustainability’ or ‘impact’ (or a variation of those terms) in the name of a fund and are intending either to use a label, or to change the name of that fund.

These temporary measures do not apply to funds using any other sustainability-related terms that are not specified above.

 

A new solar taskforce was established to accelerate the rollout of solar energy in the UK

The UK government has reactivated its Solar Taskforce to accelerate solar energy rollout as part of its 2030 clean power mission [13]. Led by Energy Secretary Ed Miliband, the taskforce aims to strengthen energy independence by expanding solar capacity, reducing reliance on fossil fuels, and protecting consumer bills. It will deliver an updated roadmap focusing on ethical supply chains, workforce development and scaling solar installations nationwide.

 

The UK government has launched a new investment support scheme aimed at boosting funding for long-duration energy storage (LDES) projects

The UK government has launched a new investment support scheme [14] to address barriers that have hindered the development of LDES for nearly 40 years. This initiative is designed to enhance energy security by allowing technologies like pumped storage hydro, which function similarly to giant batteries, to store renewable energy and release it when needed. The scheme is seeking to create jobs, expand energy independence, and is expected to save the electricity system £24bn by 2050, contributing to the UK’s clean energy goals.

 

The UK government has announced an initiative to improve energy efficiency standards for rented homes

This announcement, aiming to lift over 1m households out of fuel poverty [15], is part of the broader Warm Homes Plan, which includes the introduction of the Warm Homes: Local Grant to assist low-income tenants and homeowners with energy upgrades, as well as the continuation of the Public Sector Decarbonisation Scheme. By 2030, the government intends to raise the minimum energy efficiency standards for both private and social rented properties to at least Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) C, addressing the current inadequacies where private rentals can meet only EPC E, and social rentals have no minimum standard. The initiative aims to ensure warmer, more affordable homes while tackling issues such as dampness and high energy bills amid ongoing economic challenges. The government will shortly set out a consultation with proposals for improvements to EPCs to make them more accurate and reliable.

 

UK Climate Risk Forum published guides on 3 key areas of climate risk

The UK Climate Financial Risk Forum (CFRF), a financial services industry forum established jointly by the FCA and the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) in 2019, released new guides addressing 3 critical areas of climate risk [16].

  1. The Nature-related Risk Handbook for Financial Institutions, aiming to introduce financial institutions to the concept of nature as a risk and explore emerging practices for integrating nature-related risks into financial risk management.
  2. The Short-term Scenarios guide provides guidance for banks, asset managers and insurers on using short-term climate scenarios, in response to rising interest and their increasing application in financial planning.
  3. The Mobilising Adaption Finance to Build Resilience guide focuses on assessing physical climate-related risks and offers insight on facilitating investment in climate adaptation, highlighting the challenges in understanding and pricing physical risks.

Each guide is supported by additional documents and is intended to help the financial sector develop effective climate risk management practices. The views expressed are industry-driven and not regulatory guidance from the FCA or PRA.

 

US (other news)

SEC dissolved its climate and ESG taskforce

SEC disbanded its Division of Enforcement’s Climate and ESG Taskforce [17], which was established in 2021 to address ESG-related misconduct and evaluate whistleblower complaints. The dissolution occurred amidst industry resistance and backlash from conservative groups opposing ESG initiatives. During this tenure, the taskforce issued several enforcement actions against companies for material misstatements and omissions regarding ESG factors in investment decisions, misleading disclosures about ESG goals and practices (greenwashing), and failures to enforce stated ESG polices. Despite the taskforce’s disbandment, the SEC emphasised that its expertise now resides across the division, and ESG-related enforcement actions will continue.

 

Lawsuit filed against Texas saying the anti-ESG law violates the Constitution

In September this year, the American Sustainable Business Council (non-profit representing thousands of businesses) filed a first amendment lawsuit on grounds that Texas passed a law prohibiting state institutions from investing in companies that “boycott” energy companies. The law is claimed to be unconstitutional because it intends to “coerce and punish” businesses seeking to reduce reliance on fossil fuels [18]. Whilst anti-ESG laws have been passed in several states in the past three years, the Texas law is amongst the most prominent. The results of this lawsuit are being watched closely and they are likely to set a future precedent for legislative action against similar rulings across the country.

For those looking to discuss any of the above further, please reach out to our authors:

  • Tonia Plakhotniuk, Climate & ESG Capital Markets
  • Daniel Bressler, Climate & ESG Capital Markets, Corporates
  • Jaspreet Singh, Climate & ESG Capital Markets
  • Anika Wadhwa, Climate & ESG Capital Markets
  • Jennifer Yin, Climate & ESG Capital Markets
  • Zeyno Yurddas, Climate & ESG Capital Markets, Corporates
Sustainability
Article
Sustainability
Climate
ESG
Sustainable finance

This article has been prepared for information purposes only, does not constitute an analysis of all potentially material issues and is subject to change at any time without prior notice. NatWest Markets does not undertake to update you of such changes.  It is indicative only and is not binding. Other than as indicated, this article has been prepared on the basis of publicly available information believed to be reliable but no representation, warranty, undertaking or assurance of any kind, express or implied, is made as to the adequacy, accuracy, completeness or reasonableness of the information contained in this article, nor does NatWest Markets accept any obligation to any recipient to update or correct any information contained herein. Views expressed herein are not intended to be and should not be viewed as advice or as a personal recommendation. The views expressed herein may not be objective or independent of the interests of the authors or other NatWest Markets trading desks, who may be active participants in the markets, investments or strategies referred to in this article. NatWest Markets will not act and has not acted as your legal, tax, regulatory, accounting or investment adviser; nor does NatWest Markets owe any fiduciary duties to you in connection with this, and/or any related transaction and no reliance may be placed on NatWest Markets for investment advice or recommendations of any sort. You should make your own independent evaluation of the relevance and adequacy of the information contained in this article and any issues that are of concern to you.

This article does not constitute an offer to buy or sell, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any investment, nor does it constitute an offer to provide any products or services that are capable of acceptance to form a contract. NatWest Markets and each of its respective affiliates accepts no liability whatsoever for any direct, indirect or consequential losses (in contract, tort or otherwise) arising from the use of this material or reliance on the information contained herein. However this shall not restrict, exclude or limit any duty or liability to any person under any applicable laws or regulations of any jurisdiction which may not be lawfully disclaimed.

NatWest Markets Plc. Incorporated and registered in Scotland No. 90312 with limited liability. Registered Office: 36 St Andrew Square, Edinburgh EH2 2YB. Authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and Prudential Regulation Authority. NatWest Markets N.V. is incorporated with limited liability in The Netherlands, authorised and supervised by De Nederlandsche Bank, the European Central Bank and the Autoriteit Financiële Markten. It has its seat at Amsterdam, The Netherlands, and is registered in the Commercial Register under number 33002587. Registered Office: Claude Debussylaan 94, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. NatWest Markets Plc is, in certain jurisdictions, an authorised agent of NatWest Markets N.V. and NatWest Markets N.V. is, in certain jurisdictions, an authorised agent of NatWest Markets Plc. NatWest Markets Securities Japan Limited [Kanto Financial Bureau (Kin-sho) No. 202] is authorised and regulated by the Japan Financial Services Agency. Securities business in the United States is conducted through NatWest Markets Securities Inc., a FINRA registered broker-dealer (http://www.finra.org), a SIPC member (www.sipc.org) and a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of NatWest Markets Plc.

Copyright © NatWest Markets Plc. All rights reserved.

scroll to top